Specs
Focus: The messy intersections
of technology and social life;
feminist figurings of materiality
and their lessons for HCI and
technology design
Base:
Alex: City University of London,
London, UK
Daniela: University of
Washington, Seattle, WA
research. And yet,
troublingly, I’ve separated
this eye for detail from
the worlds I bring with
such noticings. As you say,
Ahmed and Tsing show how
noticing has its politics:
that, by “merely” noticing,
we are always already
entangled in a politics of
the personal and structural
together, where injustices,
inequities, and violence
are immanent. For me, this
shows a commitment to
much more than the details;
by paying attention to the
troubled conditions in which
we are implicated, these
books are making space
for reparative
I wanted to try something
different for this issue. We
wanted to read something
together that might helpfully
disorient ourselves and
perhaps the readers a
little. We settled on two
books: Anna Tsing’s The
Mushroom at the End of the
World (2015) and Sarah
Ahmed’s Living a Feminist
Life (2017). The first is an
extraordinary examination
of one of the world’s most
rarified mushrooms and
its travels across capitalist
supply chains and histories
of multispecies cohabitation.
The second is a feminist
treatise that weaves together
ideas from scholarship
on gender and race with
personal meditations
on everyday feminist
encounters.
Although quite different
in scope and investigating
topics conventionally
outside of HCI, both books
explore feminist figurings of
materialism that Daniela and
I have been reading alongside
our HCI and design work
for some time. Put together,
we hoped the convergences
to look around rather than
ahead” ( Tsing).
Have these forms of
noticing infected your work?
What did you find?
AT: I agree! Noticing
is thoroughly enlivened
in these exhilarating
and moving texts. I was
delighted with Tsing’s
insistence on following the
stories, of choosing to turn
away from the usual modes
of scholarly accounting,
and, instead, stay with the
noticed details of trails
spun by mushrooms. Also,
I was touched by Ahmed’s
attention to revisiting her
own profound encounters
with violence, (un)happiness,
and self-discovery,
and responding by
daring to “get
in the way.”
Between
them, such
shifts in
scale! But
together
they invite,
as you say, a
care for paying
attention
and asking
questions about
“how to live
better.”
Certainly,
attention to
details has been
central in my studies
of how lives entangle
with technologies.
This has always been
the starting point for
the ethnographies
that channel
my
and divergences might make
for something engaging,
if unconventional, for an
Interactions reader.
Daniela Rosner: Before
reading Tsing’s book, I
never thought much about
mushrooms as more than
something delicious (or
deadly!) to consume, and
certainly not as an object for
feminist world-making. But
as with Ahmed’s focus on
feminism, reading Tsing’s
account of the matsutake
mushroom is a deeply
personal tale of noticing—
noticing the pungent smell,
noticing the hidden creatures
of the forest, noticing the
layered and divergent paths
of commodity chains.
For Ahmed, noticing is a
political act, drawing forth
and realizing exclusions and
omissions. What is it that
people learn not to notice?
In learning and unlearning
across difference, Ahmed
promises opportunities for
listening anew. Together
Tsing and Ahmed reveal how
the impulse to notice can
take multiple forms. Bodies,
both living and dead, become
tools for “show[ing] us how
Alex S. Taylor and
Daniela K. Rosner
INTERACTIONS.ACM.ORG 12 INTERACTIONS NOVEMBER–DECEMBER2017
WHAT
ARE YOU
READING?