also credit the GSC for sparking their research careers.
Danielle Wilde. I am an independent artist and design
researcher, working in collaboration with organizations such as
the CSIRO, Australia’s national
scientific research organization,
Neuroscience Australia, Australian
Wool Innovation, and others. My
Ph.D. investigated the poetics of
embodied engagement afforded by
pairing technology with the body
to facilitate real and/or virtual
extension. It was the first fine-arts,
practice-led Ph.D. undertaken at
CSIRO, and was awarded the vice
chancellor’s medal for excellence. I
also received the inaugural prime
minister’s Australia Asia Award to
undertake doctoral research at the
University of Tokyo, and completed
fellowships at a number of leading
U.K. HCI, robotics, and smart materials research labs, and the Studio
for Electro-Instrumental Music
(STEIM), in Amsterdam. I hold an
M.A. in interaction design from the
Royal College of Art in London. I do
not hold an undergraduate degree.
I first attended TEI in 2009, when
I was a student volunteer. The fol-
lowing year, I was a participant in
the first GSC. Mentoring and engage-
ment with the TEI community was
an important factor in my growth.
Being a student volunteer provided
access into the heart of the TEI con-
ference very early in my doctoral
studies. The GSC afforded, most
important, critical examination of
my work from a range of perspec-
tives, deeper understanding of
how to frame my contribution, and
valuable advice on publishing and
engaging with the broader commu-
nity. The GSC facilitators generously
shared vast expertise and knowl-
edge. The structure and collegial
atmosphere of the program gave me
confidence to engage, and to form
lasting relationships with an inspir-
ing and inspired group of newly dis-
covered peers, as well as members
of the broader TEI community.
TEI. These venues have helped to
shape the ways in which the TEI
community evolves, preserving
the notion that ideas are powerful.
The impact of preparing innovators
in an emerging field is especially
important as the community continues to expand in both thought and
number. We are looking forward to
seeing where emerging TEI innovators will take us—offering rich
explorations of existing agendas,
making an impact through commercialization, and establishing
new agendas to pursue. We have
seen this happen from 2007 to
2012 and have reason to be excited
about TEI conferences to come.
Acknowledgements
We thank all conference organizers, the
many members of the TEI community,
and the GSC participants for gatherings
full of creative energy. We also thank the
panel participants, whom we have quoted in this article. This work was partially
funded by NSF award IIS-1143513.
These are just a few of the amazing TEI alumni. Many more are
emerging as TEI leaders.
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Orit Shaer is the Clare Boothe
Luce Assistant Professor of
Computer Science and Media
Arts and Sciences at Wellesley
College. Her research focuses on
how novel human-computer inter-
faces can leverage users’ cognitive, motor, and
social skills to foster collaborative problem solving.
She co-chairs the ACM 2012 Conference on
Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces.
Amon Millner is a Visiting Assistant
Professor of Computing Innovation
at the Franklin W. Olin College of
Engineering, cofounder of Modkit,
and a visiting scientist at the MI T
Media Lab. Millner directs the
Caroline Hummels is a professor in
the Department of Industrial
Design at Eindhoven University of
Technology, where she is heading
the Designing Quality in Interaction
Group. Her activities concentrate
on designing for transformation
through aesthetic interaction with open, disruptive,
innovative systems. She is one of the founders of TEI.
November + December 2012
Summary
Reflecting on the TEI GSCs is only
one way to explore trajectories in
DOI: 10.1145/2377783.2377788
© 2012 ACM 1072-5520/12/11 $15.00