For the CS New Faculty Teaching
Workshop to have the scale of impact
we envision, we had to think carefully
about strategic audience targeting. We
ultimately want to help teaching across
all computer science undergraduate
departments address today’s challenges. But we are starting with the re-search-intensive universities because
they serve as models nationally. The
top research institutions simply have
inordinate influence in the rest of the
computer science education ecosystem. Literally, a handful of schools produce most of the Ph.D.’s who go on to
be computer science faculty in the U.S.e
These newly hired faculty will also go
on to hold positions of leadership and
influence within their departments
and schools, magnifying the impact
of the cohort we directly touch each
year. As we influence enough faculty
that they form a critical mass at each
of their home departments, they will
have local peer support. With an orientation toward a scholarly view of teaching, we equip them with today’s known
best practices, and with an inclination
to follow future scholarly advances in
teaching for tomorrow’s challenges.
Changing ingrained teaching practices can be difficult. After all, we succeeded through years of our own student experiences, so we see ourselves
as experts. This model of offering new
research faculty workshops has been
effective in other disciplines. The Physics and Astronomy New Faculty Workshop has been successful in effecting
change by reaching approximately 25%
of new hires—and at least half of those
who attended the workshop reporting
adoption of evidence-based practices
in their teaching after the workshop. 2
Moreover, participants and department chairs reported a change in culture based on discussions about teaching. Charles Henderson, who evaluated
the workshop, suggests it was successful because it targeted new faculty in
only a single discipline and presented
a wide variety of pedagogical options
for potential adoption. Everyone likes
to make choices, and if you know more
than one way to teach something, you
get to make choices and improve your
enjoyment of teaching.
e https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/
blog/2015-faculty-summit-informs-and-inspires/
faculty enjoyment of teaching, even in
these outsized conditions. To achieve
this goal of disseminating effective
teaching methods, we are implement-
ing a strategy that has been successful
in other academic disciplines—putting
newly hired faculty through a CS New
Faculty Teaching Workshop,d a rigor-
ous “boot camp” workshop on how to
be effective teachers.
Many universities offer some kind
of orientation to teaching for new faculty. We are taking a page from other
STEM disciplines in teaching a CS-spe-cific introduction for new faculty at research institutions. With the credibility that can only be obtained through
being practicing CS faculty ourselves,
attendees at the CS New Faculty Teaching Workshop learn methods that have
been shown to work in CS classes. Examples are drawn from the specific CS
courses and topics the attendees will
teach in the coming year, using tools
that are specific to the needs of CS
homework and programming projects.
We teach CS faculty how to succeed
as CS faculty, without spending time
adapting more general or maybe even
inapplicable teaching strategies.
Addressing Challenges
To address the challenges in teaching
computer science, our CS New Faculty Teaching Workshop has two long-term aspirations:
˲ Change practices in the classroom
to be evidence-based, for the benefit of
faculty and students.
˲Change faculty perceptions of
teaching so they view it as a scholarly
endeavor, leveraging their scientific
thinking to continually grow and improve as instructors.
Adoption of evidence-based prac-
tices at scale in CS classes could have
profound outcomes. Other S TEM disci-
plines are reaping the benefits of active
learning. STEM students are learning
more and failing less in active learn-
ing classes compared to traditional
lectures. 1 Evidence-based teaching
practices in CS classes leads to bet-
ter performance on final exams5 and
increased retention of majors. 4 The
most common teaching practice in CS
remains an apprenticeship model—
we lecture and expect students to fig-
d http://bit.ly/New-CS-FTW
The second aspiration is to change
how CS faculty view education and
teaching. CS faculty frequently express
beliefs not only that programming is an
innate ability, but that good CS educa-
tors are “born, not made.” There is no
incentive for CS faculty to improve, to
learn to become better educators, if
they think their teaching ability is pre-
ordained. And yet, there are many tech-
niques shown by the CS education liter-
ature to improve teaching and student
outcomes. What we need is for faculty
to both value education as part of their
profession (we believe most do already!)
and for them to leverage the CS educa-
tion research literature as a source of
vetted ideas and ready solutions.
Strategy: Teach the New Faculty
to Influence the Future
New CS faculty going into research-intensive universities rarely have
much teaching experience. They are
hired because of their excellence in
research and innovation. CS New Faculty Teaching Workshop attendees
often have some anxiety about teaching. They want to do well at it but
recognize the challenges they face in
large classrooms with students from
diverse cultural and programming
backgrounds. These are exactly the
faculty whom we want to develop and
support. We want to give them the
tools to be successful in the classroom; to be effective and efficient so
they can succeed at both teaching and
research. Because they have a strong
desire to do right by their students,
they are our starting point for developing a culture that values teaching and
computing education research.
New CS faculty
going into research-
intensive universities
rarely have much
teaching experience.