Vviewpoints

I M A G E F R O M S H U T T E R S T O C K . C O M

Kode Vicious
Koding Academies
A low-risk path to becoming a front-end plumber.

year degree usually takes four years. This is not to say a four-year university program is required to learn computer science or software engineering, but it does indicate the amount of time and effort that will be required to learn skills necessary to be broadly effective in the field. Universities are expensive, and so the coding academy model should be thought of as a short-term, lower-risk way to find out if working in technology is the right fit.

Encourage your friend to pick a course that will introduce concepts that can be used into the future, rather than just a specific set of buzzword technologies that are hot this year. Most courses are based around Python. Encourage your friend to study that as a first computer language, as the concepts learned in Python can be applied in other languages and other fields. And make sure to be very direct in explaining to your friend the certificate effectively makes its holder a front-end plumber, able to unclog the series of pipes that run between businesses and consumers’ wallets, and that becoming a software engineer will take quite a bit more study and practice.

KV

Related articles on queue.acm.org

Coding Smart: People vs. Tools

Donn M. Seeley https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=945135

Saddle Up, Aspiring Code Jockeys

Kode Vicious https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1165762 Programming in Franglais

Rodney Bates https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1036495

George V. Neville-Neil ( [e-mail]) is the proprietor of Neville-Neil Consulting and co-chair of the ACM Queue editorial board. He works on networking and operating systems code for fun and profit, teaches courses on various programming-related subjects, and encourages your comments, quips, and code snips pertaining to his Communications column.

Copyright held by author.

Dear KV,

I have a friend who is looking at various coding academies and asking for my advice on courses. It has been many years since I started my career as a developer, long before coding academies existed, so I am not quite sure what advice to give. What advice would you offer?

Academy Without Academe
Dear Academy,

Consider what it means to learn to be a developer in 2019. Coding academies started sometime around 2010 and were meant to address the fact that many companies were searching for people who could write the code necessary to promote their products and services, most often referred to as “front end,” because, honestly, you would never want to see what was at the “back end.” What these academies teach is neither computer science nor software engineering, but they do fill a current niche in the coding world, and they can be an entrance into the world of technology, which is fiscally rewarding. As with all things in the world of technology— including the human systems such as the schools that support that world—it is most important to look at the limitations of any product or service.

Most coding academies structure
their courses such that they provide a
student with a short path to a new job,
often suggesting, but never promis-
ing, a job after a three- to six-month
course. I can think of no better anal-
ogy than the trade schools that used
to be advertised on late-night televi-
sion—the ones where you got a free
toolkit after completing your certifi-
cate course in plumbing. The point
of any such trade school is to provide
students with the minimum skills re-
quired to practice whatever trade they
are studying, and coding academies
are no different. Look at the webpage
for any coding academy and you will
see the usual mélange of keywords
you would expect for jobs building
websites in 2019: HTML, CSS, Java-
Script, Python, Django, Ruby on Rails,
React, Angular, SQL. To those of us
who spend our days working in soft-
ware, only a couple of those are actu-
ally programming languages that we
would recommend as part of software
engineering or computer science.
When weighing any course of educa-
tion, it is best to think in terms of what
you get out for what you put in. The
best technical educational experiences
provide mental tools and frameworks
for solving real-world problems across
a broad spectrum, which is why a four-
DOI: 10.1145/3368095

Article development led by queue.acm.org