21. Greenfield, A. Radical Technologies: The Design of
Everyday Life. Verso, London, U.K., and New York, 2017.
22. Haidt, J. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are
Divided by Politics and Religion. Vintage, New York, 2012.
23. Haworth, J.G. and Conrad, C. F. Curricular
transformations: Traditional and emerging voices in the
academy. In Revisioning Curriculum in Higher Education,
J.G. Haworth and C.F. Conrad, Eds. Simon & Schuster
Custom Publishing, New York, 1995, 191–202.
24. Huff, C. and Furchert, A. Toward a pedagogy of ethical
practice. Commun. ACM 57, 7 (July 2014), 25–27.
25. Liu, K. Here-and-Now. Kasma Online (Nov. 1, 2013);
26. Martin, C.D. and Weltz, E. Y. From awareness to action:
Integrating ethics and social responsibility into the
computer science curriculum. ACM SIGCAS Computers
and Society 29, 2 (June 1999), 6–14.
27. McNaughton, D. and Rawling, P. Deontology. Chapter 15
in The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, D. Copp, Ed.
Oxford University Press, Oxford, U. K., 2006.
28. Mihail, R., Rubin, B., and Goldsmith, J. Online discussions:
Improving education in CS? In Proceedings of the 45th
ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
(Atlanta, GA, Mar. 5–8). ACM Press, New York, 2014.
29. Murdoch, I. The idea of perfection. Chapter 1 in The
Sovereignty of Good, Routledge & Kegan Paul, Abingdon,
U.K., and New York, 1970.
30. Narayanan, A. and Vallor, S. Why software engineering
courses should include ethics coverage. Commun. ACM
57, 3 (Mar. 2014), 23–25.
31. Nevala-Lee, A. Deadline: John W. Campbell in World
War II. WorldCon 2016 Academic Track (Kansas City,
MO, Aug. 18, 2016) and personal communication.
32. Nussbaum, M. Love’s Kno wledge: Essays on Philosophy
and Literature. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 1990.
33. Pease, A. Teaching ethics with science fiction: A case
study syllabus. Teaching Ethics: The Journal of the
Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum 9, 2 (Spring
34. Perry, W. G. Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of
meaning. Chapter 3 in The Modern American College,
A. W. Chickering and Associates, Eds. Jossey Bass, San
Francisco, CA, 1980, 76–109.
35. Rodwell, G. Whose History?: Engaging History Students
Through Historical Fiction. University of Adelaide Press,
Adelaide, Australia, 2013.
36. Rogaway, P. The Moral Character of Cryptographic Work.
Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2015/1162, 2015;
37. Smith, B. Analogy in moral deliberation: the role of
imagination and theory in ethics. Journal of Medical
Ethics 28, 3 (Aug. 2002), 244–248.
38. Spradling, C.L. A Study of Social and Professional Ethics
in Undergraduate Computer Science Programs: Faculty
Perspectives. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2007; https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/
39. Von Der Weth, C. and Hauswirth, M. Finding information
through integrated ad hoc socializing in the virtual and
physical world. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/WIC/
ACM International Joint Conferences on Web
Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technologies
(Atlanta, GA, Nov. 17–20). IEEE Press, Washington, D.C.,
Emanuelle Burton ( firstname.lastname@example.org) is a faculty member
in the Computer Science Department at the University of
Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Judy Goldsmith ( email@example.com) is a professor of
computer science in the Computer Science Department at
the University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Nicholas Mattei ( firstname.lastname@example.org) is a research staff
member with the IBM Research AI-Reasoning Lab at the
T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA.
Copyright held by the authors.
Publication rights licensed to ACM. $15.00
taken? Describe them, again using the
language of your assigned theory. According to that theory, what might be a
better course of action, and why?
Argument. What argument do you
think the ending of the story intends
to make? You are still describing,
rather than arguing. Use the language
of your assigned theory to describe
Students will bring these assignments to class on the day they are
due. They are welcome to make notes
on them, over the course of discussion, for their own edification and
turn them in to the professor at the
end of class.
Teaching ethics to computer science
students is a pressing responsibility
for computer science faculty but also
a challenge. Using fiction as the basis for an ethics course offers several
advantages beyond its immediate appeal to many students and some faculty. First, fiction offers students a
way to engage with ethical questions
that helps them cultivate their capacity for moral imagination; science
fiction in particular can make the
ethical stakes of blue-sky projects
vivid, pressing, and immediate. Second, stories offer students the
chance to develop their writing and
verbal skills in ethical description.
And finally, discussing ethics in the
context of fiction can make it easier
for instructors to adopt an open-ended approach required for a good ethics course. A course built around fiction enables instructors to incorporate
the best and most useful aspects of a
humanistic approach to ethics education while remaining close to the central technological concerns within
We would like to thank John Fike, Cory
Siler, and Sara-Jo Swiatek for proofreading and discussion to improve this article. The ideas here are based on work
supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1646887. Any
opinions, findings, and conclusions or
recommendations expressed in this
material are those of the authors and
do not necessarily reflect the views of
the National Science Foundation.
1. Bates, R., Goldsmith, J., Berne, R., Summet, V., and
Veilleux, N. Science fiction in computer science
education. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical
Symposium on Computer Science Education (Raleigh,
NC, Feb. 29–Mar. 3). ACM Press, New York, 2012,
2. Bates, R., Goldsmith, J., Summet, V., and Veilleux, N.
Using science fiction in CS courses. In Proceedings of
the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer
Science Education (Atlanta, GA, Mar. 5–8), ACM Press,
New York, 2014, 736–737.
3. Bates, R. A. AI & SciFi: Teaching writing, history,
technology, literature and ethics. In Proceedings of the
ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (Vancouver, B. C.,
Canada, June 26–29). American Society for Engineering
Education, Washington D. C., 2011, 1–12.
4. Beard, M. Ethics, morality, law: What’s the difference?
The Ethics Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Aug. 27,
5. Bonnefon, J.-F., Shariff, A., and Rahwan, I. The social
dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science 352, 6293
(June 24, 2016), 1573–1576.
6. Boyer, E.L. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the
Professoriate. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1997.
7. Burton, E., Goldsmith, J., Koenig, S., Kuipers, B., Mattei,
N., and Walsh, T. Ethical considerations in artificial
intelligence courses. AI Magazine 38, 2 (Summer 2017),
8. Burton, E., Goldsmith, J., and Mattei, N. Teaching AI
ethics using science fiction. In Proceedings of the First
International Workshop on AI, Ethics and Society at the
29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Austin,
TX, Jan. 25–30). Association for the Advancement of
Artificial Intelligence, Palo Alto, CA, 2015, 33–37.
9. Burton, E., Goldsmith, J., and Mattei, N. Using ‘The
Machine Stops’ for teaching ethics in artificial
intelligence and computer science. In Proceedings of
the Second International Workshop on AI, Ethics and
Society at the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial
Intelligence (Phoenix, AZ). Association for the
Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Palo Alto, CA,
10. Callahan, D. Goals in the teaching of ethics. Chapter 2 in
Ethics Teaching in Higher Education. Plenum Press, New
York, 1980, 61–80.
11. Colbeck, C. L. Merging in a seamless blend: How faculty
integrate teaching and research. The Journal of Higher
Education 69, 6 (Nov./Dec. 1998), 647–671.
12. Davis, B. G. Tools for Teaching, Second Edition.
Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2009.
13. Dils, L.S. Science fiction and the future. Curriculum Unit,
Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute, New Haven, CT,
14. Edmiston, B. Ethical imagination: Choosing an ethical
self in drama. Chapter 3 in Imagining to Learn: Inquiry,
Ethics, and Integration Through Drama. B. Edmiston and
J.D. Wilhelm, Eds. Heinemann Drama, Portsmouth, NH,
15. Executive Board of the American Anthropological
Association. Statement on Human Rights. American
Anthropologist 49, 4 (Oct.-Dec. 1947), 539–543.
16. Garcia Iommi, L. Let’s watch a movie!: Using film and
film theory to teach theories of international politics
from a critical perspective. In Proceedings of the
American Political Science Association 2011 Annual
Meeting (Seattle, WA, Sept. 1–4). American Political
Science Association, Washington, D. C., 2011; https://
17. Goering, S. Using children’s literature as a spark for
philosophical discussion: Stories that deal with death.
Chapter 15 in Ethics and Children’s Literature, C. Mills,
Ed. Ashgate, Farnham, U.K., 2014, 233–247.
18. Goldsmith, J. and Burton, E. Why teaching ethics to AI
practitioners is important. In Proceedings of the 31st
AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (San
Francisco, CA, Feb. 4–9). Association for the
Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Palo Alto, CA,
19. Goldsmith, J. and Mattei, N. Science fiction as an
introduction to AI research. In Proceedings of the
Second AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in
Artificial Intelligence (San Francisco, CA, Aug. 7–11).
Association for the Advancement of Artificial
Intelligence, Palo Alto, CA, 2011, 1717–1722.
20. Goldsmith, J. and Mattei, N. Fiction as an introduction to
computer science research. ACM Transactions on
Computer Science Education 14, 1 (Mar. 2014), 1–14.
Watch the authors discuss
their work in this exclusive