EDITOR
Jonathan Grudin
jgrudin@microsoft.com
User experience was a central concern. The 1951
conference may have been the first computer con-
ference with published proceedings. Subsequent
joint conferences met twice most years from 1953
to 1972, then annually as the National Computer
Conference (NCC) from 1973 to 1988. After that, we
gathered in specialized conferences to describe our
wonderful critters, what we wished we had done
differently, and how “we are going to fix that in our
new model.”
Researchers of that era focused on journal pub-
lication, but papers contributed by major figures
in computer science were published at these “must
attend” conferences. This included oft-cited work
by people who inspired and contributed to human-
computer interaction. In our rapidly evolving field,
one need not study history, but to get a sense of
where current trajectories might take us, it can be
useful to know how past trajectories ended, and
what has remained constant over time.
what if “parents” appeared with an attorney at
their side? Congress had considered facilitating the
publication of orphaned works, but pulled back.
Some might have significant commercial value, but
conference papers from half a century ago were not
among them.
The great news is that ACM has scanned an
almost complete set of the proceedings, covering most of the years from 1951 to 1984. We are
reconnected to a large piece of our history! The
documents are available as digital library conference proceedings at http://portal.acm.org/proceed-ings/afips/. Not yet online are the AFIPS Office
Automation Conference (OAC) proceedings from
the 1980s, which include, for example, papers by
Douglas Engelbart and one by Irene Greif describing
the private symposium for which the term “
computer supported cooperative work” was coined.
(ACM plans to add the remaining volumes when
accessible copies are located.)
An Orphan Finds a Home
AFIPS was large and prosperous. So much so that
it built multimillion-dollar headquarters. Then
AFIPS collapsed. In 1990, its records and collections
were hauled to a dump. Four years ago, I asked
“To whom, if anyone, did AFIPS grant copyright
ownership of its books, magazines, and especially
the proceedings of the joint and national computer
conferences?” Neither ACM nor IEEE had a record of
it. At one point near the end, AFIPS arranged with
Springer to publish one of its journals, but Springer
could find no pertinent records. A warehouse fire
was mentioned. I tracked down AFIPS officers from
that period, now in retirement; none had definitive
recollections.
Why did I care? In the absence of a copyright
owner, it could be risky to publish “orphaned”
works that were influential in our early history—
History Lessons
A systematic survey of AFIPS contributions to
computer science and HCI could be the basis for
another article. With several volumes still missing,
the proceedings include papers by a majority of the
55 Turing Awards winners. (Many of those who are
not represented worked abroad.) This includes sin-gle-authored papers by 22 Turing Award winners,
including Engelbart, Fred Brooks, Ed Feigenbaum,
Alan Kay, Marvin Minsky, Allen Newell, Herb
Simon, Ivan Sutherland, and others influential in
HCI and related disciplines.
I conclude with two general observations
prompted by these proceedings and the struggle to
preserve them.
First, reviewing the past makes it clear that hardware research becomes obsolete relatively quickly
in our field—we won’t learn much from papers on
Office Automation
Conferences (OAC)
Eastern and
Western
Joint Computer
Conferences
Spring and Fall
Joint Computer
Conferences
March + April 2010
National Computer
Conferences (NCC)
• Figure 2. Orphaned Computer Research Conferences. AFIPS organized conferences from 1961-1988.
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990
2000
2010