tous and yet discreet reachabili-ty—this technology has become
a tool of the intimate sphere [ 4].
Research indicates that we are
mostly using the mobile phone
to talk to our closest family and
friends.
One of the main effects of
the mobile phone is that it
changes the way that we micro-coordinate our everyday affairs
[ 5]. Previous to the rise of the
mobile phone, we most often
coordinated activities by agreeing to a time and a place where
we would meet. In this regime,
there was—and indeed often
still is—the assumption that
all participants have access to
a correctly synchronized timekeeping device. Thus, we coordi-
nated our meetings by referring
to our watch and assumed that
the other meeting partners also
did the same, with a device that
was in good working order. If
they had forgotten to wind their
watch, if it was running fast or
slow or, in more contemporary
times, the battery of their watch
was dead, the efforts at coordination were frustrated.
The mobile phone changes
this process. We can negotiate
both the time and the place via
the mobile phone in real time
[ 6]. If one partner is a bit late
because of traffic, for example,
he or she can simply call or text
to the others in order to rearrange the meeting. If the cafe
where we were to meet our
friend is too full, we can suggest an alternative. If we do not
remember if our spouse wanted
cheese or milk from the store, a
quick call will clear up the issue.
The ability to micro-coordinate
may indeed be the most profound social consequence of
the mobile phone. It provides
us with a simple way to keep in
touch with one another and to
make, and re-make, arrangements.
It is wrong, however, to think
that the mobile phone is used
only for instrumental interaction. It is also a channel through
which we express our emotions
(“I love you so much John, but
I still need to divorce Harry”),
we experience power relations
[ 4] Ling, R. Ne w Tech,
New Ties: How Mobile
Communication Is
Reshaping Social
Cohesion. Cambridge:
MIT Press, 2008.
[ 5] Ling, R., and B. Yttri.
“Hyper-coordination
Via Mobile Phones in
Norway.” In Perpetual
Contact: Mobile com-
munication, private talk,
public performance,
edited by J. E. Katz and
M. Aakhus, 139-169.
Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2002.
[ 6] See A. M. Townsend,
“Life in the Real Time
City - mobile telephones
and urban metabo-
lism,” Journal of Urban
Technology 7 (2000):
85-104; and R. Ling, The
Mobile Connection: The
cell phone’s impact on
society. San Francisco:
Morgan Kaufmann,
2004.