Student-focused Initiatives for Retaining Students
in Computing Programs
For further information
or to submit your
ACM TRETS is a
archival journal that
include all levels
and all aspects
6. Code.org. Hour of Code for all ages; https://code.org/
hourofcode/overview. Accessed 2018 January 23.
7. Cohoon, J. M. and Aspray, W. A Critical Review of the
Research into Women’s Participation in Postsecondary Computing Education. in J. M. Cohoon and W.
Aspray (Eds.), Women and Information Technology:
Research on Under-Representation. (Cambridge, MA:
MI T Press, 2006), 137–178.
8. Computing Research Association. “Generation CS:
Computer Science Undergraduate Enrollments Surge
Since 2006; http://cra.org/data/Generation-CS/.
Accessed 2018 January 4.
9. CRA-W. Distributed Research Experiences for
Accessed 2018 January 29.
10. Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., and Kruger,
J. Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own
Incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological
Science, 12, 3 (2003), 83–87.
11. Dweck, C. S. Mindset: The new psychology of
success. (Random House Incorporated, 2006).
12. Frieze, C. and Quesenberry, J. Kicking Butt in
Computer Science: Women in Computing at
Carnegie Mellon University. (Indianapolis: Dog Ear
Publishing, November 2015).
13. Frieze, C. and Treat, E. Diversifying the Images
of Computer Science: Carnegie Mellon Students
Take on the Challenge. in Proceedings of the 2006
WEPAN Conference (WEPAN-Women in Engineering
Programs and Advocates Network); http://www.
2018 January 29.
14. Frieze, C., et al. Diversity or Difference? New
Research Supports the Case for a Cultural
Perspective on Women in Computing. Journal of
Science Education and Technology, 21, 4 (2012);
Difference.pdf. Accessed 2018 January 29.
15. Google Inc. IgniteCS program; https://ignitecs.
withgoogle.com/. Accessed 2018 January 7.
16. Google Inc. and Gallup Inc. Encouraging Students
Toward Computer Science Learning. Results From
the 2015-2016 Google-Gallup Study of Computer
Science in U. S. K- 12 Schools. (Issue Brief No. 5).
December 2017; https://goo.gl/iM5g3A. Accessed
2018 January 12.
17. Great Minds in STEM. Mentornet; http://mentornet.
org/. Accessed 2018 January 29.
18. Harper, S. R., and Hurtado, S. Nine themes in campus
racial climates and implications for institutional
transformation. New Directions for Student Services,
120 (2007), 7–24.
19. Jagacinski, C., Lebold, W. K., and Salvendy, G. Gender
differences in persistence in computer-related fields.
Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 2
20. Joshi, K. D., et al. Choosing I T as a Career: Exploring
the Role of Self-efficacy and Perceived Importance
of I T Skills. in Proceedings of the 31st International
Conference on Information Systems. (St. Louis,
21. Kay, K., and Shipman C. The Confidence Gap.
The Atlantic. April 2014; http://www.theatlantic.
gap/359815/. Accessed 2018 January 29.
22. Lewis, C. M. Twelve tips for creating a culture that
supports all students in computing. ACM Inroads, 8,
4 (2017), 17–20.
23. Margolis, J. and Fisher, A. Unlocking the Clubhouse,
Women in Computing. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,
24. Massi, L. et al. Engineering and computer science
community college transfers and native freshmen
students: Relationships among participation in extra-curricular and co-curricular activities, connecting
to the university campus, and academic success. in
Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). (Seattle,
WA: October 2012), 1–6.
25. NCWIT. AspireI T K- 12 Outreach Program; https://
program. Accessed 2018 January 23.
26. NCWI T. Counselors for Computing; https://www.
Accessed 2018 January 7.
27. NCWI T. Top 10 Ways Families Can Encourage Girls’
Interest in Computing; https://www.ncwit.org/
girls-interest-computing. Accessed 2018 January 7.
28. Ong, M., et al. Inside the double bind: A synthesis of
empirical research on undergraduate and graduate
women of color in science, technology, engineering,
and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 2
29. Oracle. Workshop in a Box; https://academy.oracle.
com/en/ training-workshop-in-a-box.html. Accessed
2018 January 10.
30. Pon-Barry, H. Packard, B. W. and St. John, A.
Expanding capacity and promoting inclusion in
introductory computer science: a focus on near-peer
mentor preparation and code review. Computer
Science Education, 27, 1 (2017); http://www.
3270. Accessed 2018 January 10.
31. SAM. Student Achievement Measure; http://www.
studentachievementmeasure.org/. Accessed 2018
32. Stanford University. CS103A—Mathematical Problem-Solving Strategies; http://web.stanford.edu/class/
cs103a/ and http://web.stanford.edu/class/cs103a/
Accessed 2018 January 29.
33. U.S. Department of Education. College Scorecard;
2018 January 4.
34. University of California—Berkeley. A Guide to
Handling Student Absences Due to Minor Illness;
https://teaching.berkeley.edu/guide-handling-student-absences-due-minor-illness. Accessed 2018
35. University of California—Irvine. Student Success
Initiatives; http://ssi.uci.edu/. Accessed 2018 January 8.
36. University of California—Irvine. Women in
Information and Computer Sciences ( WICS); http://
wics.ics.uci.edu/. Accessed 2018 January 29.
37. Walker, H. M. Retention of students in introductory
computing courses: preliminary plans---ACM
retention committee. ACM Inroads, 8, 4 (2017), 12.
38. Walker, H. M. “Retention of students in introductory
computing courses: curricular issues and approaches.”
ACM Inroads, 8, 3 (December 2017), 14–16.
Debra J. Richardson
Department of Informatics
5241 Donald Bren Hall
University of California
Irvine, CA 92697-3440
DOI: 10.1145/3204467 Copyright held by author.