interfaces, and extensive efforts to cultivate a broad ecosystem of partners.
But Jobs and Apple have shown us another path to platform leadership, and
not just for a niche product segment:
Design breakthrough products that set
new standards for form, function, and
aesthetics; market them creatively and
aggressively, with some modest reductions in price over time; open them up
gradually as industrywide platforms,
and let the chips fall where they may.
This strategy will be very hard to duplicate without a Steve Jobs at the helm.
But it is more of a win-win scenario for
the innovator (still lots of money to be
made) and the user (we all end up with
better products, not just platforms).
Raising the Bar
But beating Microsoft or Google at
their own platform game is not what
seems to have motivated Steve Jobs.
He appears to have cared most about
the impact that technology and innovation, delivered in their most cultivated
forms, can have on people’s lives. For
example, he is famous for a quip about
Microsoft back in the mid-1990s that
the company “has no taste” and did not
bring the best of human culture into
its products. Jobs cited the example of
proportionally spaced fonts in the Macintosh, an idea he got from looking at
beautiful books and the history of printing, and which Windows later copied.b
By contrast, Bill Gates and Microsoft
focused on software operating systems
that led to cheap and powerful PCs as
well as lots of applications but were
b Public Broadcasting System, “Triumph of the
Nerds,” The Television Program Transcript,
Part III; http://www.pbs.org/nerds/part3.html.
Beating microsoft
or Google at their
own platform game
is not what seems
to have motivated
Steve Jobs.
relatively clumsy and difficult to use
for the average consumer. Today’s PCs,
digital media players, smartphones,
and tablets based on Windows or even
Android are as good as they are only
because of how much Steve Jobs and
Apple raised the bar—for everyone.
Charisma and Leadership
In the 1996 PBS documentary, “Tri-
umph of the Nerds,” Larry Tesler, who
used to work at Apple, discussed how
Steve Jobs was able to inspire people
to surpass what even they believed they
could accomplish. He would never
settle for anything less than someone’s
absolutely best effort, and then some.
That is how Jobs raised the bar for the
Macintosh project—whose competi-
tion was the character-based IBM PC
and compatibles—and many products
since then, most recently the iPad. Tes-
ler recalled: “When I wasn’t sure what
the word charisma meant, I met Steve
Jobs and then I knew.”c
Let’s be sure to give adequate credit
to Apple cofounder Steve Wozniack for
Apple’s early products as well as to Jona-
than Ive for being chief designer of the
iPod, iPhone, iPad, and several hit Ma-
cintosh desktop computers and laptops.
And to Scott Forstall, who headed iOS
software development. New CEO Tim
Cook, formerly the COO, has also been
a highly effective leader of sales and op-
erations since Jobs recruited him from
Compaq Computer in 1998. But it has
taken extraordinary charisma and lead-
ership skills to bring so many diverse
personalities together and channel their
considerable talents so productively.
This does not happen often or by chance.
c Public Broadcasting System, “Triumph of the
Nerds,” The Television Program Transcript,
Part III; http://www.pbs.org/nerds/part3.html.
It’s in the details
When Jobs and Wozniak cofounded
Apple in 1976, they believed, along with
Bill Gates and Paul Allen, who cofounded Microsoft in 1975, that the world
would one day be full of personal computers. These entrepreneurs had something else in common: They all had
the skills, in varying degrees, to build
the products they dreamed of. Jobs
needed Wozniak’s technical wizardry
to shrink down the number of chips
and construct the internals of Apple’s
early computers. Gates and Allen were
preeminent software programmers,
especially Gates. But Jobs stands far
above his peers for the degree to which
he combined extremely astute technological vision with an ability to dive into
the smallest details of his products, including hardware, software, industrial
design, and marketing.
We have heard about the care Jobs
took to design the Apple II case, with
consumer electronics as his model,
and how he tackled the many challenges posed by the Macintosh, ranging from reducing the price tag to the
time it took to boot up. The users that
bought these and other Apple products
quickly came to love them—truly love
their elegant look and feel in a way that
seems unparalleled in any other competitor’s products.
Until recently, Jobs continued to be
deeply involved in the iPhone and iPad
designs, both of which have the same
look and feel about them that we first
marveled at in the original Macintosh.
I should not have been surprised to
learn from the recent reporting that
Jobs is listed as a coinventor of 313
patents, beginning with personal com-
puter cases but extending to internal
PC electronics and designs for lap-
tops, multimedia devices (the iPod),
smartphones (the iPhone), operating
systems (NeXT, iOS), keyboards, mice,
and Apple TV.d
I am also left with the thought that
great entrepreneurs do not really see
the future as much as they create the
future they envision. Steve Jobs knew
how to build and sell game-changing
products, down to the smallest details.
d Shan Carter, “Steve Jobs’ Patents,” The New
York Times (Aug. 25, 2011); http://www.ny-
times.com/interactive/2011/08/24/technol-
ogy/ steve-jobs-patents.html?emc=eta1