creative organization, with people
who can learn about new technologies
and markets. Companies also need to
nurture deep, enduring skills, such as
by understanding how to marry high
technology with consumer electronics. JVC could have done better after
the VCR era had it evolved its skills
more quickly from analog to digital
technology, and then to networked
systems and hardware driven by software, rather than software driven by
hardware. Sony faced the same challenges and did slightly better but not
good enough. Though it still makes
Walkman multimedia devices as well
as PCs, smartphones, and video game
consoles, and owns its own music label and movie studio, Sony continues
to look for hit hardware products and
always seems to find itself trailing in
the newer platform markets.
Google
Google’s platform was initially the Internet, based on a better search engine.
But Google made its technology nearly
ubiquitous on PC desktops with the
downloadable and free toolbar. It then
built an Internet portal, replete with
email, maps, applications, storage,
and other features, to surround and
feed the search engine. Google monetizes its leadership position by selling
targeted ads that accompany searches.
But Google has not stopped there. The
company realized years ago that most
computing would one day be on mobile devices. So Google bought and
then refined the Android operating system (which is based on Linux) and created the Chrome browser to facilitate
mobile computing (and mobile searches as well as advertising). Google is now
the largest smartphone OS provider
and plans to challenge Apple directly
by acquiring Motorola’s mobile phone
business. But not even Google has done
everything right. It was slow to see the
importance of social networking. It has
been trying for years (with limited success) to challenge Facebook and create
a coalition of partners to gain access
to more social networking and social
media content—again, presumably, to
sell more search and advertising.
The lesson here? Again, platform
leaders must force themselves to think
broadly about their platforms and
business models while extending their
technical and marketing capabilities.
Google has always focused on search,
but computing has been moving be-
yond the desktop for years and even
beyond the Internet—to multiple de-
vices as well as applications and con-
tent that reside within both open (such
as the Internet) and closed (such as
Facebook) networks. Moreover, Google
has challenged the modus operandi of
the computer industry—proprietary
technology. Its software platform for
mobile phones and other devices such
as Netbooks and tablets is both free
and open. It is difficult for companies
that charge for their technology and do
not have large advertising income—
like Apple and Microsoft, as well as
Nokia—to beat free and open.
nokia
This Finnish company remains the
largest producer of cellphones, and
its Symbian software has been a dominant platform for basic handsets. However, mobile sales are quickly moving
to smartphones that require more sophisticated software. Not surprisingly,
Nokia has seen its market share, market
value, and financial performance suffer
dramatically as RIM’s BlackBerry and
Apple’s iPhone handsets, and a variety
of devices from different companies
running Google’s Android software,
have come to dominate the market.
Nokia removed its CEO and is now led
by a former Microsoft executive, Steven
Elop, who recently announced plans to
abandon the Symbian operating system as well as another joint OS project
with Intel. Instead, Elop wants to use
Microsoft’s Windows phone software
for Nokia’s next generation of smartphones.
The lesson here? Once more, we
see that platform leaders must be prepared to evolve and even discard their
technologies and sometimes their
business models as well. If they fail to
develop new technology internally or
find suitable acquisitions, they may
well find themselves adopting the platform technology of a competitor. We
shall see what happens to Nokia, but
the future does not look very bright.
microsoft and apple
Steve Ballmer, Microsoft CEO since Bill
Gates handed over the reins in 2000, is
often criticized for not being able to
Calendar
of Events
october 16–21
International conference on
Model Driven Engineering
Languages and Systems,
Wellington, New Zealand,
Sponsored: SIGSoFT,
Contact: Thomas Kuehne,
Email: tk@ecs.vuw.ac.nz
october 16–19
The 24th Annual ACM
Symposium
on Interface Software
Technology,
Santa Barbara, CA,
Sponsored: SIGGRAPH, SIGCHI,
Contact: Jeff Pierce,
Email: drjpierce@mac.com
october 17–19
Symposium on Algorithmic
Game Theory,
Amalfi, Italy,
Contact: Giuseppe Persiano,
Email: giuper@dia.unisa.it
october 17–21
The ACM Conference on
Computer and Communications
Security,
Chicago, IL,
Sponsored: SIGSAC,
Contact: Yan Chen,
Email: ychen@northwestern.
edu
october 19–21
Creativity and Innovation in
Design,
Eindhoven, Norway,
Contact: Martens Jean-Bernard,
Email: j. b.o.s.ma
rtens@tue.nl
october 19–22
Research in Applied
Computation Symposium,
Miami, FL,
Sponsored: SIGAPP,
Contact: Jiman Hong,
Email: jiman@ssu.ac.kr
october 19–22
ACM Special Interest Group
for Information Technology
Education Conference,
West Point, NY,
Sponsored: SIGITE,
Contact: Edward J. Sobiesk,
Email: edward.sobiesk@
us.army.mil
october 23–26
ACM SIGoPS 23rd Symposium
on operating Systems
Principles,
Cascais, Portugal,
Sponsored: SIGoPS,
Contact: Edward Pearce Wobber,
Email: wobber@microsoft.com