into algorithm plug-ins, it is algorithmically possible to modularize visualization and interaction design. Future
work will focus on developing “
visualization layers” supporting selection
and combination of reference systems, projections/distortions, graphic
designs, clustering/grouping, and interactivity.
Streaming data. The number of
data sets that are generated and must
be understood in real time is increasing; examples are patient-surveillance
data streams and models of epidemics
that predict the numbers of susceptible, infected, and recovered individuals in a population over time. EpiC
tool development funded by the National Institutes of Health contributes
algorithms that read and/or output
streams of data tuples, enabling algorithms to emit their results as they run,
not only on completion. Data-graph visualizations plot these tuple streams
in real time, resizing (shrinking) the
temporal axis over time.
Web services. The OSGi/CIShell-based tools discussed here are standalone desktop applications supporting offline work on possibly sensitive
data, using a GUI familiar to target
users. However, some application domains also benefit from online deployment of macroscopes. While the OSGi
specification provides basic support
for Web services, CIShell must still be
extended to make it easy for domain
scientists to design their own macroscope Web services.
Incentive design. Many domain
experts have trouble trying to use an
evolving set of thousands of possibly
relevant data sets compiled for specific
studies of inconsistent quality and coverage, saved in diverse formats, and
tagged using terminology specific to
the original research domains. In addition, thousands of algorithms that support different functionality and diverse
input and output formats are written
in different languages by students and
experts in a range of scientific domains
and packaged as algorithms or tools
using diverse licenses. More-effective
means are needed to help domain experts find the data sets and algorithms
most relevant for their work, bundle
them into efficient workflows, and relate the results to existing work. Scholarly markets resembling a Web 2.0
version of Craigslist.org can help ease
the sharing, navigation, and utilization
of scholarly data sets and algorithms,
reinforcing reputation mechanisms
by, say, providing ways to cite and acknowledge users who share, highlight
most downloaded and highest-rated
contributions, and offer other means
for making data sets, algorithms, workflows, and tutorials part of a valued
scholarly record.
acknowledgments
I would like to thank Micah Linnemeier and Russell J. Duhon for stimulating
discussions and extensive comments.
Bruce W. Herr II, George Kampis,
Gregory J. E. Rawlins, Geoffrey Fox,
Shawn Hampton, Carol Goble, Mike
Smoot, Yanbo Han, and anonymous
reviewers provided valuable input
and comments to an earlier draft. I
also thank the members of the Cyberinfrastructure for Network Science
Center ( http://cns.iu.edu), the Network Workbench team (http://nwb.
cns.iu.edu), and Science of Science
project team ( http://sci2.cns.iu.edu)
for their contributions toward this
work. Software development benefits
greatly from the open-source community. Full software credits are distributed with the source, but I especially
acknowledge Jython, JUNG, Prefuse,
GUESS, GnuPlot, and OSGi, as well as
Apache Derby, used in the Sci2 tool.
This research is based on work supported by National Science Foundation grants SBE-0738111, IIS-0513650,
and IIS-0534909 and National Institutes of Health grants R21DA024259
and 5R01MH079068. Any opinions,
findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed here are those
of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
References
1. atkins, D.e., Drogemeier, k.k., Feldman, s. I., garcia-molina, h., klein, m.l., messerschmitt, D.g., messian,
P., ostriker, J.P., and wright, m.h. Revolutionizing
Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure.
Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon
Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. national
science Foundation, arlington, Va, 2003.
2. börner, katy. Atlas of Science: Visualizing What
We Know. mIt Press, Cambridge, ma, 2010;
supplemental material at http://scimaps.org/atlas
3. börner, k., barabási, a.-l., schnell, s., Vespignani, a.,
wasserman, s., wernert, e.a., balcan, D., beiró, m.,
biberstine, J., Duhon, r.J., Fortunato, s., herr II, b.w.,
hidalgo, C.a., huang, w.b., kelley, t., linnemeier, m.w.,
mcCranie, a., markines, b., Phillips, P., ramawat, m.,
sabbineni, r., tank, C., terkhorn, F., and thakre, V.
Network Workbench Tool: User Manual 1.0.0., 2009;
http://nwb.cns.iu.edu/Docs/nwbtool-manual.pdf
4. börner, k., Chen, C., and boyack, k.w. Visualizing
knowledge domains. In Annual Review of Information
Science & Technology, b. Cronin, ed. Information
today, Inc./american society for Information science
and technology, medford, nJ, 2003, 179–255.
5. börner, k., Dall’asta, l., ke, w., and Vespignani,
a. studying the emerging global brain: analyzing
and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams.
Complexity (Special Issue on Understanding Complex
Systems) 10, 4 (mar./apr. 2005), 57–67.
6. börner, k., huang, w.b., linnemeier, m., Duhon,
r. J., Phillips, P., ma, n., Zoss, a., guo, h., and Price,
m.a. rete-netzwerk-red: analyzing and visualizing
scholarly networks using the network workbench
tool. Scientometrics 83, 3 (June 2010), 863-876.
7. Cyberinfrastructure for network science Center.
Cyberinfrastructure Shell (CIShell) Algorithm
Developer’s Guide, 2009; http://cishell.wiki.cns.iu.edu
8. de rosnay, J. Le Macroscope: Vers une Vision Globale.
Editions du Seuil. harper & row Publishers, Inc., new
york, 1975.
9. De roure, D., goble, C., and stevens, r. the design
and realisation of the myexperiment Virtual research
environment for social sharing of workflows.
Future-Generation Computer Systems 25 (2009), 561–567.
10. elnashai, a., hampton, s., lee, J.s., mclaren, t.,
myers, J. D., navarro, C., spencer, b., and tolbert, n.
architectural overview of maeviz–haZturk. Journal
of Earthquake Engineering 12, 1 suppl. 2, 01 (2008),
92–99.
11. herr II, b.w., huang, w.b., Penumarthy, s., and
börner, k. Designing highly flexible and usable
cyberinfrastructures for convergence. In Progress in
Convergence: Technologies for Human Wellbeing, w.s.
bainbridge and m.C. roco, eds. annals of the new york
academy of sciences, boston, 2007, 161–179.
12. hull, D., wolstencroft, k., stevens, r., goble, C.,
Pocock, m.r., li, P., and oinn, t. taverna: a tool for
building and running workflows of services. Nucleic
Acids Research ( Web Server Issue) 34, suppl. 2 (July
1, 2006), w729–w732.
13. kampis, g., gulyas, l., szaszi, Z., and szakolczi, Z.
Dynamic social networks and the textrend/CIshell
framework. Presented at the Conference on applied
social network analysis (university of Zürich, aug.
27–28). eth Zürich, Zürich, switzerland, 2009.
14. mons, b., ashburner, m., Chicester, C., Van mulligen, e.,
weeber, m., den Dunnen, J., van ommen, g.-J., musen,
m., Cockerill, m., hermjakob, h., mons, a., Packer, a.,
Pacheco, r., lewis, s., berkeley, a., melton, w., barris,
n., wales, J., mejissen, g., moeller, e., roes, P. J.,
börner, k., and bairoch, a. Calling on a million minds
for community annotation in wikiProteins. Genome
Biology 9, 5 (2008), r89.
15. shannon, P., markiel, a., ozier, o., baliga, n.s., wang,
J.t., ramage, D., amin, n., schwikowski, b., and Ideker,
t. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrating
models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome
Research 13, 11 (2002), 2498–2504.
16. shiffrin, r. and börner, k. mapping knowledge
domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 101, suppl. 1 (apr. 2004), 5183–5185.
17. shneiderman, b. science 2.0. Science 319, 5868 (mar.
2008), 1349–1350.
18. shneiderman, b. the eyes have it: a task by data
type taxonomy for information visualizations. In
Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual
Languages (boulder, Co, sept. 3–6). Ieee Computer
society, washington, D.C., 1996, 336–343.
19. thomas, J. J. and Cook, k.a., eds. Illuminating the
Path: The Research and Development Agenda for
Visual Analytics. national Visualization and analytics
Center, richland, wa, 2005; http://nvac.pnl.gov/
agenda.stm
20. world bank and International monetary Fund. Global
Monitoring Report 2009: A Development Emergency.
the world bank, washington, D.C., 2009.
Katy Börner ( katy@indiana.edu) is the Victor h. yngve
Professor of Information science at the school of library
and Information science, adjunct Professor at the school
of Informatics and Computing, and Founding Director
of the Cyberinfrastructure for network science Center
( http://cns.iu.edu) at Indiana university, bloomington, In.
© 2011 aCm 0001-0782/11/0300 $10.00