csta letter
DOI: 10.1145/1610252.1610253
Chris Stephenson
For many, the recent news that enrollments in undergraduate
computer science programs are no longer on a downward slide
is reassuring, but I seriously hope that it doesn’t begin to undo
the good that has come out of our mutual fear, most
it is a Pivotal time for
K– 12 Computer Science
especially that it does not diminish the
commitment across all educational lev-
els to address the serious issues in K– 12
computer science education.
Creating real, sustainable change in
any area of education is a frustratingly
slow process. Public education is a com-
plex bureaucracy where competing ide-
ologies, philosophies, ontologies, and
pedagogies vie for attention and con-
trol. It is subject to extreme pressures.
As a profession, teaching is simultane-
ously professionalized and devalued.
And, in most cases, the employees are
overworked, underpaid, and severely
under-resourced.
But change is possible. Five years
ago, ACM founded the Computer Sci-
ence Teachers Association (CSTA) with
the goal of addressing serious concerns
in K– 12 computer science education,
including the lack of curriculum stan-
dards, poor professional development
for teachers, common misunderstand-
ings about computer science, student
and parent perceptions that there are
no jobs in the computing field, and the
complete mess that is computer science
teacher certification.
Today, CSTA stands as an example
that faith, funding, and a whole lot of
volunteer support from the top to the
bottom can achieve something close
to miracles. The guidelines in the ACM
Model Curriculum for K– 12 Computer Sci-
ence are now recognized as the defacto
national computer science curriculum
standards. Thanks to its partnership
with colleges and universities through
the JET T and TECS programs, CSTA has
held more than 96 professional devel-
opment workshops for teachers across
the U.S. The annual Computer Science
& Information Technology symposium
is the closest thing we have to an annual
national conference for K– 12 computer
science and information technology
educators. CSTA’s white paper The New
Educational Imperative: Improving High
School Computer Science Education pro-
vides a cogent, research-supported ar-
gument for the role that computer sci-
ence must play in the K– 12 academic
canon. Careers in computing resources
developed by CSTA and the ACM Edu-
cation Board have now made their way
into every school in the U.S. and sev-
eral other countries as well. Finally,
CSTA’s new report on teacher certifica-
tion (Ensuring Exemplary Teaching in
an Essential Discipline) proposes a new
framework for guaranteeing we have
the teachers we require with the skills
we need in our classrooms.
But something equally important
came out of the enrollment crisis. Col-
leges and universities facing dwindling
class sizes began reaching out to K– 12
computer science educators and stu-
dents in order to recruit students direct-
ly into their programs, and in doing so,
many faculty learned that the assump-
tions they had been making about what
it is like to teach computer science in
K– 12 were misguided at best and pater-
nalistic at worst.
Many colleges and universities now
have ongoing outreach and mentoring
programs because they understand that
waiting for students to come to them is
a recipe for disaster. Interest in comput-
er science must begin long before stu-
dents sign up for their first university or
college courses. It begins in K– 12 where
other academic disciplines first sow the
seeds of interest and engagement.
This increased interest in direct
outreach to K– 12 has also prompted
a greater level of understanding and a
spirit of cooperation across educational
levels that will benefit us greatly in the
long run, but only if we do not lose sight
of what we are doing and return to our
former isolated complacency.
The next year will be a pivotal one for
us. Talk (and hopes) of a new, relevant,
rigorous, and more engaging sequence
of high school computer science courses
(including a new gold standard Advance
Placement computing course) and an
ambitious plan for teacher professional
development could mean a real renais-
sance for our discipline and field.
As we begin to work toward these
goals, the challenges will be enormous
as will the temptation to circle the wag-
ons and fire inward. I hope our com-
munity has the vision to rise above frag-
mentation and discord so we can work
together to do something important
and valuable. We did it when we formed
CSTA and I think we can do it again to
reframe computer science education.
Chris Stephenson ( chris.stephenson@comcast.net)
is the executive director of Computer Science Teachers
Association.
© 2009 ACM 0001-0782/09/1200 $10.00