CACM_TACCESS_one-third_page_vertical:Layo
˲ 41.3% of respondents described
their current job responsibilities as
Software/Applications Designer, Developer, or Engineer, followed by
23.2% as Systems Architect, Designer,
or Engineer, followed by 19.9% as Academic. Indeed, we are watching an increasing slant among the magazine’s
readership toward practitioners and
researchers in industry and the types
of content that appeals to them is driving some of the changes we are making with Communications.
˲ The average reader is male ( 88.8%),
down from 91.7% in the previous survey, 43. 1 years old, down from 45. 6
years old in the previous survey, has an
average of 18. 1 years of computing experience, down from 19. 9 years in the
previous survey, and has been a member of ACM for 9. 8 years, down from
13. 1 years in the previous survey. All
of these statistics indicate that more
women are entering the field (although
not as quickly as many would like) and
Communications is attracting a younger
overall readership.
˲The average respondent looks
through 3. 1 out of every 4 issues of the
magazine and spends an average of
60. 9 minutes reading each issue. By
comparison, based on research conducted by Harvey Research, Inc. from
1996 to present, the median time
spent reading business-to-business
magazine titles is 38 minutes for computer titles (based on 12,500 respondents over 131 studies) and 38 minutes for non-computer titles (based on
29,700 respondents over 351 studies)
with the average time spent reading
over all business-to-business magazine titles being 30.7 minutes (based
on 1,796 studies conducted to date
over 456 different magazine titles).
˲ 68.6% of respondents noticed the
editorial revamp of the magazine that
started with the July 2008 issue and of
those who noticed the change 89.9%
felt it had a positive effect on the
magazine.
˲ 58.7% of respondents read at least
half of an issue’s total editorial content.
˲ Of those who noticed the editorial
revamp, 78.8% felt the changes make
it more likely they would recommend
the magazine to a friend and 77.3%
felt the magazine is more relevant to
them now than in the past.
˲ The most frequently read “de-
“i feel the new
structure, sections,
and content provide
a richer experience…
perhaps with a
broader scope.”
—Practitioner
partment” that appears in the magazine is the Editor’s Letter ( 85.2%). The
most frequently read “section” is the
Research Highlights: Main Article
( 93.4%). And the most frequently read
“column” is Viewpoints ( 86.4%).
˲ In contrast, when asked to select
their three favorite departments, sections, or columns, 53.1% of respondents selected the Research Highlights: Main Article, followed by 44.7%
for Contributed Articles, 35.9% for
Practice articles, and 35.9% for the Research Highlights: Technical Perspectives. For the most part, what people
are spending their time reading is not
always their favorite material, so more
investigation is certainly warranted.
˲ Related to the new
Communications Web site, which launched several
months ago, 46.2% of respondents
were aware the Web site was being
redesigned and 39.5% have visited
the redesigned site. If you have not already visited the site, please do so at
http://cacm.acm.org and login with
your ACM Web Account information.
The editorial staff and editorial
board for Communications will spend
the coming months reviewing and
analyzing all of the data compiled in
the 2009 Communications of the ACM
Readership Survey and in future issues will begin implementing many of
the most frequently suggested changes. While the work is really just beginning, we at ACM are very pleased at
the initial steps taken and very much
appreciate your continued feedback
and support of the Association’s flagship publication.
ACM
Transactions on
Accessible
Computing
◆◆◆◆◆
This quarterly publication is a
quarterly journal that publishes
refereed articles addressing issues
of computing as it impacts the
lives of people with disabilities.
The journal will be of particular
interest to SIGACCESS members
and delegrates to its affiliated
conference (i.e., ASSETS), as well
as other international accessibility
conferences.
◆◆◆◆◆
www.acm.org/taccess
www.acm.org/subscribe
Scott E. Delman, PUBLIShER