DOI: 10.1145/1498765.1498769

What Role for computer Science
in the War on terror?

The contributed article “The

Topology of Dark Networks”

by Jennifer Xu and Hsin-

chun Chen (Oct. 2008) ig-

nored sensitive cultural is-

sues while addressing a subject that

might by itself offend some people

in Muslim societies, including those

in the Middle East. The software sys-

tem it described for fighting what

some might call “Islamic terrorism”

represents a highly charged political

subject. A more appropriate place to

publish would have been in a pub-

lication sponsored by, say, the U.S.

Department of Defense, Central Intel-

ligence Agency, or Federal Bureau of

Investigation. ACM, which claims to

be independent, with a clear mission

to advance computer science while

being open to members from around

the world and free of geographic, eth-

nic, religious, or political affiliations,

should stick to this mission and not

involve itself in the so-called War on

Terror.

Science is a universal language

that should be used to bridge gaps be-

tween cultures, promote understand-

ing and cooperation, and avoid wors-

ening damage caused by politicians

who push the world toward trouble.

ACM should not take on such a sen-

sitive subject that only increases ten-

sions and does not make the world a

better place.

This is my personal opinion. I

would not seek to impose it on or

cause offense to anyone.

othman el moulat, rabat, Morocco

understand illicit covert communication

and interaction networks. We agree that

computing research should not be used

for political purposes. We also hope that

our research supports the study and

understanding of deeply complex social

phenomena.

Jennifer Xu, Waltham, MA

hsinchun chen, Tucson, AZ

separating P from NP. Such an error

may be pardoned, even overlooked,

in the science columns of a general-

interest newspaper or magazine, but

not in Communications.

madhavan mukund, Chennai, india

What Gates’s most
enduring Legacy Should Be

Michael Cusumano’s Viewpoint column “Technology Strategy and Management” on “The Legacy of Bill Gates” (Jan. 2009) displayed a rather stunning values system by saying that “grow[ing] the PC software business… should be Gates’ most enduring legacy.” This is not a prediction of what will be Gates’s most enduring legacy, though on this issue I would differ as well. Rather, it is a normative statement of what should be his most enduring legacy. Does Cusumano really hope that the massive changes now under way in international public health will not endure? His conclusion should not have been so surprising after he referred to Gates’s philanthropy as “highly laudable” but only in the context of bemoaning what a distraction it had become from his business interests. I still found my jaw dropping at the word “should.”

max hailperin, St. Peter, Mn

Lindley Responds:

Mukund is correct; this was a slip-up, though one that’s easily rectified.

In its earlier paragraphs, the story defined an NP problem as one for which no polynomial-time solution is known, then explained the distinction between NP and NP-complete, but in introducing the unresolved question of whether P and NP are truly distinct, I should have referred to NP problems generally, not NP-complete problems in particular. With this in mind, the paragraph in question would read correctly.

David Lindley, Alexandria, vA

Communications welcomes your opinion. to submit a letter to the editor, please limit your comments to 500 words or less and send to letters@cacm.acm.org.

Coming Next Month in

COMMUNICATIONS

Security in the Browser

Spending Moore’s Dividend

nP-completeness not the Same
as Separating P from nP

In his news story “The Limits of Computability” (Nov. 2008) David Lindley wrote: “Showing that a problem is NP-complete means proving that no known algorithm can solve it in polynomial time.”

In fact, saying that a problem is NP-complete means only that it is “as hard as” any other problem in NP. Lindley apparently confused the definition of NP-completeness with the problem of

Computing Needs Time

Xu Responds:

We apologize if our article appeared to be targeting particular groups. This was certainly not our intent. Our research tried to address the new Dark Network phenomenon using selected examples and available datasets. Our hope is to develop advanced, science-based, data-driven intelligence and security-informatics techniques that help analyze and

Debugging AJAX

Algorithmic System Biology

Plus the latest news on compressive sampling; computational advertising, and international education.

APriL 2009 | voL. 52 | no. 4 | communicAtionS of the Acm

9

References:

mailto:letters@cacm.acm.org

Archives