DOI: 10.1145/1378727.1378729 Scott E. Delman
at the end of
the day this
is a magazine
by and for the
computing
community, and
like any other
community
initiative is
almost entirely
dependent upon
the participation
of its members.
50 Years Young
I’ve received dozens of email messages
providing feedback on the July issue.
More than any other sentiment ex-
pressed in those messages is the sense
of excitement that Communications has
taken a positive step forward and at the
same time has returned to its roots. As
Publisher, I am both gratified and con-
flicted by this feedback. In many ways,
Communications is an icon for the com-
puting community, with a long-standing
tradition of quality that has stood the
test of time. Changing an icon is not an
easy thing to do and is not without sig-
nificant risks, especially when the icon
is also the flagship publication for the
community’s leading Association and
as such the primary vehicle for com-
municating what is happening across
the computing field. Nevertheless, this
change was necessary because both the
community and field have been evolving
and growing so rapidly in recent years
that a new and more comprehensive
global voice needed to be created simply
to keep pace.
This Communications is more than a
revamped version of a 50-year-old publication, it is a completely new magazine
with an entirely new voice. With a new
look and feel, a new editorial board, a
new editorial scope, and a more global
vision, Communications is attempting
to appeal to a broader cross section of
the computing field and become even
more relevant for those across the entire
discipline, as well as those entering the
field and those working on its fringes.
An example of this is the decision to expand the News section and hire professional journalists to cover a wider range
of timely and important topics. In each
issue, you can expect to find three in-depth news articles, one written from
a technology perspective, one from a
science perspective, and one from a so-
cietal perspective. The depth of these
articles is greater than can be found in
less specialized publications, in keeping with Communications’ emphasis on
technical sophistication and rigor.
Throughout the magazine, you will
find other examples of ways
Communications is reaching out to a broader
community. These include the creation
of the Practice section, aimed primarily at those working in industry but appealing to all Communications readers.
Another is the introduction of Technical
Perspectives that accompany full-length
research papers and intended to make
pure computer science research more
accessible and contextually relevant to
the practitioner and educator.
While the verdict is far from in, I am
pleased to say that I received a number
of letters from loyal readers who informed me the July issue was one of the
first they’ve read cover to cover in a number of years, but at the same time they
were skeptical that it would be possible
to keep the magazine as relevant on a
consistent basis. My response to this is
simple. The magazine has a new editorial board second to none, an incredible
publishing staff committed to making
Communications better with every issue, and an organization behind it that
supports all of this effort. But at the end
of the day this is a magazine by and for
the computing community, and like any
other community initiative is almost entirely dependent upon the participation
of its members. What you get out of this
magazine is what you as a community
put into it. So please get involved, submit your best articles, and do not hesitate to contact us with your suggestions.